▲ 541 ▼ Tech companies like Google, Facebook and Microsoft are ignoring data controls mandated under California privacy law at ‘industrial scale’ (globalprivacyaudit.org) submitted 6 months ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world 66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Aaron@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children) Absolutely right. It's not a law for them, it's a fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 0 points 6 months ago (2 children) Doesn't even amount to the taxes they paid the month the fine was issued. It's barely the cost of doing business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yeah, these ineffective fines need to stop. perhaps the following would work better: 1st offense: warning, public humiliation, reparations to the wronged. 2nd offense: meaningfully huge fine 3rd offense: even bigger fine and c-level prosecutions. 4th offense: stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. 5th offense: public tar and feathering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago Counter: First intentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. First unintentional offense: meaningfully huge fine, equal to no less than 25% of annual revenue. Second intentional offense: won't happen, due to the first intentional offense permanent stop order. Second unintentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. The only way to fix this is to make it hurt from day one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 0 points 6 months ago (2 children) Doesn't even amount to the taxes they paid the month the fine was issued. It's barely the cost of doing business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yeah, these ineffective fines need to stop. perhaps the following would work better: 1st offense: warning, public humiliation, reparations to the wronged. 2nd offense: meaningfully huge fine 3rd offense: even bigger fine and c-level prosecutions. 4th offense: stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. 5th offense: public tar and feathering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago Counter: First intentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. First unintentional offense: meaningfully huge fine, equal to no less than 25% of annual revenue. Second intentional offense: won't happen, due to the first intentional offense permanent stop order. Second unintentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. The only way to fix this is to make it hurt from day one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 child) Yeah, these ineffective fines need to stop. perhaps the following would work better: 1st offense: warning, public humiliation, reparations to the wronged. 2nd offense: meaningfully huge fine 3rd offense: even bigger fine and c-level prosecutions. 4th offense: stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. 5th offense: public tar and feathering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago Counter: First intentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. First unintentional offense: meaningfully huge fine, equal to no less than 25% of annual revenue. Second intentional offense: won't happen, due to the first intentional offense permanent stop order. Second unintentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. The only way to fix this is to make it hurt from day one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago Counter: First intentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. First unintentional offense: meaningfully huge fine, equal to no less than 25% of annual revenue. Second intentional offense: won't happen, due to the first intentional offense permanent stop order. Second unintentional offense: permanent stop work order and c-level prosecutions and personal liability. The only way to fix this is to make it hurt from day one. permalink fedilink source parent