you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

I agree that this is extremely simplified, however your radio example implies physicists only do physics for money and nobody would have explored the applications of radio waves without a profit motive which seems at odds with... Well, literally every scientist I've ever met.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    It wasn't a physicist who found an application for radio waves though is the thing.

    It was someone looking to monetize it somehow, who also happened to be a scientist in a different field.

    Now, would someone else maybe eventually look into using radio waves somehow? Probably. But when the physicists are saying "neat, but useless", it'll probably delay such discovery even further since there's only one motivation, not two. Not to mention, said scientist would now have to convince the community to give them materials to look into this radio waves thing that physicists think can't be used practically. Materials which could be used for something else that could be deemed more important at the time because it's use might already be known, like bridges or infrastructure or just electricity wiring in general.

  • source
  • parent