you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

Nope. Courts decided: AI output is never copyrightable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    They ruled that for copyright to apply, a human must have authored the work.

    Now if an AI spits out code that's a duplicate of a humans authored work. Then you could argue the author is actually the original human. And this it would be covered by their original copyright

  • source
  • parent