More people do X makes X more done.

why does it fail so horribly for X = protecting a secret? or does it?

(I'm not 3, by the way...)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 6 months ago (5 children)

They're not protecting 'a' secret. They're protecting their copy of the secret.

So while you get X more work, you get X more copies to protect. So you're actually losing ground.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    my favorite answer so far. it is exactly what i meant but i did not realize that it being the same secret (which is technically just half implied by the grammar i think) is what breaks the dynamics.

    if it's 1000 different secrets, then it kind of works but only if the guesser knows/assumes the distribution is uniform. (if it's the same secret then the guesser knows it's the same secret then that's the extreme, maybe a "degenerate" case, like having 1000 doors to one bank.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Do they get the whole secret, or just a piece?

    Do they get the secret (or their piece of it) "in the clear" or is it encrypted? Do they even know who holds the encryption key(s)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments