▲ 537 ▼ Washington Post editorial board says don't tax the rich (lemmy.ml) submitted 6 months ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml 82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] VAK@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (6 children) Alright, no exceptions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (5 children) Okay, hire a shit ton more IRS agents and expect tax seasons to last forever as everyone gets literally everything they own appraised. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] valar@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago Worth it permalink fedilink source parent [–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (3 children) Lol, if less complicated, that is, if there are no exceptions, then you need fewer agents permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) Tell me in what world do you need fewer agents to appraise literally everything owned by everybody every year? I bet you own things you've forgotten about, but some IRS agent would have to go over all of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) In the world where you have so many loopholes, and with so much complexity, that you have to anyway keep track of who's got what, who owes what to whom, what something is worth, etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Then close the loopholes. Much simpler. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (5 children) Okay, hire a shit ton more IRS agents and expect tax seasons to last forever as everyone gets literally everything they own appraised. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] valar@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago Worth it permalink fedilink source parent [–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (3 children) Lol, if less complicated, that is, if there are no exceptions, then you need fewer agents permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) Tell me in what world do you need fewer agents to appraise literally everything owned by everybody every year? I bet you own things you've forgotten about, but some IRS agent would have to go over all of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) In the world where you have so many loopholes, and with so much complexity, that you have to anyway keep track of who's got what, who owes what to whom, what something is worth, etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Then close the loopholes. Much simpler. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (3 children) Lol, if less complicated, that is, if there are no exceptions, then you need fewer agents permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) Tell me in what world do you need fewer agents to appraise literally everything owned by everybody every year? I bet you own things you've forgotten about, but some IRS agent would have to go over all of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) In the world where you have so many loopholes, and with so much complexity, that you have to anyway keep track of who's got what, who owes what to whom, what something is worth, etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Then close the loopholes. Much simpler. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) Tell me in what world do you need fewer agents to appraise literally everything owned by everybody every year? I bet you own things you've forgotten about, but some IRS agent would have to go over all of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) In the world where you have so many loopholes, and with so much complexity, that you have to anyway keep track of who's got what, who owes what to whom, what something is worth, etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Then close the loopholes. Much simpler. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VAK@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) In the world where you have so many loopholes, and with so much complexity, that you have to anyway keep track of who's got what, who owes what to whom, what something is worth, etc etc permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Then close the loopholes. Much simpler. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Then close the loopholes. Much simpler. permalink fedilink source parent
