you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This comparison is like saying that, because a car can be used to run over pedestrians at any time, there is no reason to be alarmed about people installing the Crosswalk-pocalypse 5000 (now with 30% more spikes!) on their front bumper.

Of course we know people can discretely record you with a phone. The difference is that the fraction of people doing that is very small, while the percentage of people doing that with Meta glasses is basically 100%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    the fraction of people doing that is very small, while the percentage of people doing that with Meta glasses is basically 100%.

    care to give me any citation at all on that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly, pulling it out of my ass.

    Now your turn... what is your definition of "very small", and where is your citation that a larger percentage of the population uses their phone camera to discretely creep on people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment