"A paper last month by LSE professor Luis Garicano and co-authors extends the idea that jobs are bundles of tasks, to consider whether the different activities in a job are a tightly bound bundle or something more akin to an itemised list of discrete activities. In the context of software, a contractor or junior hire generally falls into the latter group: these jobs are weak bundles, with daily work consisting mainly of writing code to spec — tasks that could be given to someone else (or AI) without any disruption to the workflow or the quality of the final product. Here, AI breaks off a large chunk of the job and leaves a role with substantially diminished scope (or obviates the need for that hire or contract). But senior developers, or coders working outside the tech industry in roles where their programming skills are combined with domain-specific expertise, tend to have jobs comprising tightly enmeshed and cross-functional tasks. Here extracting the coding part of the job from all the rest is much harder, so the bundle of tasks remains intact. Instead of becoming a competitor AI becomes an assistant, enhancing rather than eroding the job. This fits with the findings from Brynjolfsson and our own analysis that hiring for senior software roles continues to hold up better than for junior ones."ft.com/content/b69f8599-eaf1-4#AI #GenerativeAI #Automation #Productivity #Programming #SoftwareDevelopment #Unemployment #Layoffs