More than 70 organizations, including the ACLU, EPIC, and Fight for the Future, say the AI smart glasses feature would endanger abuse victims, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ people.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260413160924/https://www.wired.com/story/meta-ray-ban-oakley-smart-glasses-no-face-recognition-civil-society/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

The main issue isn’t even the technology itself, it’s that it’s Meta and owned by the Zuck.

I’m sure there are ways to engineer this so the data stays on device and use it for specific scientific purposes exclusively.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    There is absolutely.

    You'll never appease the shareholders or maintain your quarterly growth that way... ^Trump is pushing to eliminate quarterly reports for public companies, so they may not need to care and can just be evil for the sake of it.^

    It's funny how they enshittify it for consumers first, but now aiming spread enshitification to wall street so they can fuck those 401ks even harder.

    Capitalism baby!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    The main issue isn’t even the technology itself, it’s that it’s Meta and owned by the Zuck.

    There are a thousand corporations tripping over themselves to out-horrify the public.

    I’m sure there are ways to engineer this so the data stays on device and use it for specific scientific purposes exclusively.

    I'm sure there are but if you see one in public, how would you know? Best just to ban them all.

  • source
  • parent