I'm pretty hardline in My beliefs, but I acknowledge nuance. For example, I think veganism is anarchist because human supremacy is an unjust hierarchy. I don't think carnism is anarchist. But people who are otherwise anarchist can be carnist, because anarchism is a process, not an absolute. Hopefully those people will eventually interrogate their biases and stop eating meat. Stuff like that.

I do not understand the thought processes of the anarchists who are pro-AI. I understand the excuses very well, but I just don't understand how an anarchist piles that many excuses together into a conclusion and thinks they've arrived at it logically. It's like being pro-oil and saying "Well I have an oil well in my backyard and I'm using a clean burning generator, so it's anarchist".

Also, the more someone claims to be a hardline anarchist, the more I expect of someone. I don't expect liberals to know anything about neopronouns because that's not the world they live in. But with anarchists, I expect them to listen when I tell them I use capitalised pronouns, not accuse Me of lying.