you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 7 months ago* (5 children)

Do you have a study then, dont just come and take a shit.

I want the study to include storage, and maintenance obviously, and any backup power required for 100% grid reliability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    You're trying to claim that a study based on the ERCOT numbers during the 2021 Texas winter storm is at all representative of anything. It's worth nothing whatsoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    The study included Germany too, did it not?

    The point of the study was including the effects of intermittency and non-dispatchability, which is what makes LCOE a flawed metric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    There's little point discussing a study that is largely just pure fossil fuel industry propaganda

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    As opposed to green energy companies propaganda that rarely even mention the need for storage? Theres a tangible reason most countries arent fully moving to it for baseload power, its not a conspiracy.

    Heres a longer video on it if you can stomach the fact nuclear is better than solar/wind:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifUaM7uwjqU

    I wont even get into the fact most refining and manufacturing is done in China using subsidized coal, and is why they are the leader in solar/battery production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment