243
Trump slurs his way through jaw-dropping Iran war address with no clear end in sight (www.independent.co.uk)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A weary President Donald Trump slurred his way through a disjointed national TV address Wednesday night in which he repeated the same justifications for his war with Iran that he's been posting on social media throughout the month-long conflict.

The primetime speech, which pre-empted scheduled television programming on all broadcast networks at the request of the White House, had been billed as a major address in which Trump would finally lay out the justifications for the military action he started against Iran — one that would finally provide details on how and when the conflict would end to an American populace that has grown weary of it.

Instead, the president spent nearly 20 minutes speaking from a lectern in the White House’s main foyer, in prepared marks that often repeated, word for word, his Truth Social posts, and offered contradictory statements about the war, Iran and the now bogged down Strait of Hormuz, while repeatedly having trouble pronouncing words like “enemies,” “Venezuela” and “battlefield.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Worst.

Drilling in the North Sea is ramping up. Seriously. This means every country with suspected oil reserves is throwing money into a defunct technology instead of doubling down on renewables.

My country had a plan in motion to set up a green hydrogen plant, which was planned to act as an energy reserve for Europe. I fear we will see it completely forgotten and instead the plans of surveying our coast for alledged oil reserves to come back. In the 2000's, early surveys pointed towards reserves just 30km off our shores possibly larger than the entire stock of Venezuela and Mid-East, combined, and easily harvestable.

Nobody needs this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It could be argued though, that for the time and money taken to explore, map, develop, then extract that dinosaur juice, you could have built an entire country's worth of renewable energy sources.

    Especially when you factor in that all that oil will be sold at "global market price", so none of it will result in cheaper energy for anyone.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Sincerely speaking, I hope your obviously correct argument wins when the usual suspects start talking about "alternatives".

    Investing into renewables, paired with batteries and green hydrogen production makes sense.

    The news where it is constantly pointed that renewables are unreliable because the sun and wind are not constant while at the same time we are getting news that solar energy production alone is reaching new output record, above fossil fuels, are nothing if not loathsome.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Pumped Hydro or simple hot sand (I shit you not) are good ways of storing excess energy without resorting to direct electrical storage solutions (which are improving year on year at a swift pace too).

    There are a lot of other ways being explored too. To name but a couple; pumped geothermal storage using everything from old mines to aquifers (a few degrees C in a lot of water is a lot of energy and deep mines will add it for free), and underwater pressure energy storage (I like this one for it's simplicity and sustainability).

    But you're totally correct. The oil industry has almost infinite money and power, and thus an almost unassailable influence on politics and policy.

    The hope lies in the almost. With a bit of luck, things will get bad enough that the populous at large start to question whether being so dependent on other countries for the ability to move shit around is such a cracking idea when the alternative is right there, today, not in a decade when any local oil begins to flow, if there is any to be had.

    A smart politician would spin a wholehearted policy shift to renewables as "ensuring the sovereignty of our nation's energy supply, the backbone of our economy, which should never be beholden to foreign governments or corporations". Done right, it could be used to rally the "rabid far right" and the "loony left" of any country to the same greater good for all of humanity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Your argument was spot on with what was said to defend the conversion of a deactivated refinery into a hydrogen plant.

    This is a relatively small country, with a small population, so achieving energy independence makes complete sense. We have a very strong solar, wind and hydroelectric instalation already in place, enough that we have already several registered days where no fossil energy nor foreign bought was necessary to supply our demand. But it is common for 90% of our produced energy to be sold (cheaply) and the energy we use to be bought.

    We are an example to all and yet the distrust towards renewables is generalized, to the point many even think the wind turbines cause heat trapping where the machines are installed, leading to fires and droughts.

    It is disheartening. I remember reading that 10% of all the money invested annually into the oil industry could cause renewables to leap ten years forward in research.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent