▲ -13 ▼ Do you think strict two child policy should be a thing? (literature.cafe) submitted 7 months ago by Karl@literature.cafe to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 53 comments fedilink hide all child comments With exceptions in cases like when a couple loses a child Edit: in a scenario where everything is good. No wars, no famine.
[+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children) I said in another comment that I meant as an upper limit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children) I also replied that it was not the point. The point is you're accusing the question of being about controlling women. Which it isn't. Why do you keep forgetting things we already discussed and going back to it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) So? It still doesn't mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know. To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith. There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion. And my question wasn't 'Why do you think 2 child policy is good?' It was 'Do you think two child policy is good?' Which could be answered with 'NO' which is a good answer (if there isn't a moral way to implement it). I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know You're not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I'd have deleted the post already. XD permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children) I said in another comment that I meant as an upper limit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children) I also replied that it was not the point. The point is you're accusing the question of being about controlling women. Which it isn't. Why do you keep forgetting things we already discussed and going back to it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) So? It still doesn't mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know. To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith. There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion. And my question wasn't 'Why do you think 2 child policy is good?' It was 'Do you think two child policy is good?' Which could be answered with 'NO' which is a good answer (if there isn't a moral way to implement it). I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know You're not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I'd have deleted the post already. XD permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children) I also replied that it was not the point. The point is you're accusing the question of being about controlling women. Which it isn't. Why do you keep forgetting things we already discussed and going back to it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) So? It still doesn't mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know. To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith. There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion. And my question wasn't 'Why do you think 2 child policy is good?' It was 'Do you think two child policy is good?' Which could be answered with 'NO' which is a good answer (if there isn't a moral way to implement it). I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know You're not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I'd have deleted the post already. XD permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children) I also replied that it was not the point. The point is you're accusing the question of being about controlling women. Which it isn't. Why do you keep forgetting things we already discussed and going back to it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) So? It still doesn't mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know. To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith. There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion. And my question wasn't 'Why do you think 2 child policy is good?' It was 'Do you think two child policy is good?' Which could be answered with 'NO' which is a good answer (if there isn't a moral way to implement it). I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know You're not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I'd have deleted the post already. XD permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) So? It still doesn't mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know. To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith. There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion. And my question wasn't 'Why do you think 2 child policy is good?' It was 'Do you think two child policy is good?' Which could be answered with 'NO' which is a good answer (if there isn't a moral way to implement it). I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know You're not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I'd have deleted the post already. XD permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Karl@literature.cafe [S] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) So? It still doesn't mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know. To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith. There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion. And my question wasn't 'Why do you think 2 child policy is good?' It was 'Do you think two child policy is good?' Which could be answered with 'NO' which is a good answer (if there isn't a moral way to implement it). I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know You're not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I'd have deleted the post already. XD permalink fedilink source parent