▲ 163 ▼ Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de) submitted 7 months ago by protestation@discuss.tchncs.de [B] to c/communism@lemmy.ml 73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (5 children) If you're asking in good faith, read China has billionaires permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -16 points 7 months ago (4 children) I don’t click links. Any country that allows billionaires to exist is not a communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago (3 children) So you're not talking in good faith, thanks for confirming it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago (2 children) By good faith you mean believing in what you believe in otherwise it’s not good faith? Pathetic. Anyone who simps for a country who allows billionaires to exist is not an actual communist. They are a capitalist in a red hat who just hates the west. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (1 child) No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you'd end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we'd give you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are. That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -16 points 7 months ago (4 children) I don’t click links. Any country that allows billionaires to exist is not a communist country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago (3 children) So you're not talking in good faith, thanks for confirming it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago (2 children) By good faith you mean believing in what you believe in otherwise it’s not good faith? Pathetic. Anyone who simps for a country who allows billionaires to exist is not an actual communist. They are a capitalist in a red hat who just hates the west. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (1 child) No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you'd end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we'd give you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are. That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago (3 children) So you're not talking in good faith, thanks for confirming it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago (2 children) By good faith you mean believing in what you believe in otherwise it’s not good faith? Pathetic. Anyone who simps for a country who allows billionaires to exist is not an actual communist. They are a capitalist in a red hat who just hates the west. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (1 child) No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you'd end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we'd give you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are. That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago (2 children) By good faith you mean believing in what you believe in otherwise it’s not good faith? Pathetic. Anyone who simps for a country who allows billionaires to exist is not an actual communist. They are a capitalist in a red hat who just hates the west. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (1 child) No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you'd end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we'd give you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are. That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (1 child) No, by good faith I meant willing to consider context, facts and understand the other side, even if you disagree at the end you'd end up sharpening your argumentation, instead you ask a rhetoric question and then refuse to engage with the answer we'd give you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are. That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org -14 points 7 months ago I already know what the link says. I already know your arguments. This isn’t my first time making that statement. There are zero things you can say that I haven’t already heard and there are zero things I can say to change your mind. I am as firm as you are. That’s not bad faith. That’s just not agreeing with you. permalink fedilink source parent