800
Spez (Reddit CEO) just put out an announcement talking about how they'll verify bots vs humans. Get ready for a wave of new users into the Fediverse pretty soon! (www.reddit.com)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
293 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

But why do you need to talk down to me like I'm an idiot instead of just correct me politely? I'm genuinely curious because it seems to be a very common thing nowadays where percieved confident incorrectness and ignorance is met with distain and anger. I didn't mean to offend anyone when I made this comment and was simply brainstorming while bored at work.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Let me first clarify that I think you seem very nice and I'm not mad at you, nor do I have any intent to make you feel bad. I think you're misreading my tone, tbh. That or I'm expressing my tone poorly.

    So, I thought I did correct you politely, within the bounds of also needing to make very clear and unambiguous that you needed to adjust your confidence when talking about this subject. I have no issue with someone idly brainstorming ideas, but in the context of your original comment "There are so many ways to do human verification that have worked for years.", which you didn't qualify in any way, you sounded completely authoritative and sure of yourself. Since you yourself even know that you are ignorant on this topic, to me a better phrasing would be to preface that with something like "I think..." Or "It seems like...", or even outright saying "I don't really know about this stuff, but..." Etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    It's definitely hard to tell someone's tone when it comes to text so i appreciate you mentioning that. I understand the confusion as I wasnt very clear in what I was talking about which is 100% my fault. I went a little off the handle and got defensive, I will admit, and I apologize for that.

    I guess the point that I was trying to make is more so that we have many different ways to do it for years I was talking about things like captchas. The problem, in my opinion, is that captchas didn't evolve with the Internet. We've been picking traffic lights for over a decade now and it's obviously not working anymore. My whole idea with drawing pictures was to make it more human centric than clicking a bunch if buttons. Something that can take in the raw input of a mouse cursor or touchscreen and determine whether or not the movements are "human". Like a fingerprint that doesn't identify you. If it sees too many predictable patterns it flags it. I just feel like there's a lot of wasted potential in older human verification systems that have stagnated. We've just accepted bots as the norm online and the company's in charge aren't doing a damn thing besides saying they'll do something with no action.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Because you made a dumb claim with confidence. You were talked down to because you were acting like a fool. Which you're still doing btw.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Yeah well I don't really care for your opinion and I wasn't talking to you. I appreciate the feedback, though. The person above seems like they actually have social skills outside of calling people "chuds" and "neckbeards" as their only respone so I'd much rather talk to them tbh

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent