▲ 1193 ▼ Meta found liable in child exploitation case (www.theguardian.com) submitted 7 months ago by staircase@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world 148 comments fedilink hide all child comments ... while they feign child protection to avoid costs
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 7 months ago (2 children) So the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) Yes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago Just an itch to be scratched. Done. What's for lunch? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) Yes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago Just an itch to be scratched. Done. What's for lunch? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago Just an itch to be scratched. Done. What's for lunch? permalink fedilink source parent