383
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind (media.hachyderm.io)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Related:

This is in a PR where Shougo, another long-time contributor, communicates entirely in walls of unparseable AI slop text: https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/19413

Thank you for the detailed feedback! I've addressed all the issues:

Thank you for the feedback! I agree that following the Vim 8+ naming convention makes sense.

Thank you for the feedback on naming!

Thanks for the suggestion! After thinking about this more, I believe repeat_set() / repeat_get() is the right choice:

Thank you for the feedback. A brief clarification.

https://hachyderm.io/@AndrewRadev/116176001750596207

@AndrewRadev@hachyderm.io

Christian Brabandt's comment on a PR: "I did pipe this through claude and he is not too happy about this:"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

honestly, an amazing and respectable answer with solid reasoning

up to you if you'd like to add a footnote, either way I'm rooting for you this is good stuff

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I added several quotes from the copyright office’s guidance that show their specific usage of the term “human authorship” to the More Information section. :)

    One interesting thing is that they explicitly say that a work that is “authored by non-human spiritual beings” can only qualify for copyright protection if there is “human selection and arrangement of the revelations”, and even then, only the compilation is copyrighted, not the “divine messages”.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent