Absolutely nothing in journalctl, dmesg, etc 😭

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

its not the system that handles wol, it doesn't need to ping anything. even the net adapter doesn't need to do that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’m not sure what you are trying to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wanted to say this is not how it works:

    My pet theory is that a lot of systems are constantly looking at what is active on the network and those pings are keeping the machine awake.

    or if you meant that, computers are normally not pingable when they are asleep. net adapters only wake the computer when seeing a magic packet with their mac address in it, and it is the operating system that receives the ping request and decides to send back a ping response.

    an exception is when it is set up to wake on some network traffic pattern, but few net adapters support that mode of operation

    https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Wake-on-LAN#Enable_WoL_on_the_network_adapter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I was saying that my theory is that this functionality is broken or being bypassed on Windows such that when it gets hit by for instance the Network Discovery or “Do you have this update already downloaded?” ping from another Windows computer it wakes up to have a chat. I meant other systems are looking for active machines and those pings are waking it up or keeping it from going to sleep. I may have chosen a bad slang since ‘ping’ is a net command.

    This theory is based on my understanding that computers don’t go all the way to sleep anymore and reenabling S3 restores normal sleeping. I included WoL because I have a machine that doesn’t have the S3 option but disabling WoL seemed to help on that one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This theory is based on my understanding that computers don’t go all the way to sleep anymore and reenabling S3 restores normal sleeping.

    yeah, now that you say that is probably most laptops in the last few years. but I don't think desktops do it. wrong, even my 4+ years old pc motherboard supports it according to /sys/power/mem_sleep

  • source
  • parent