you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

I tried Krita. It's not not as good as GIMP is. What I will say is, it is pretty good for what it is and offers stuff that GIMP does not have. In fact I wanted to switch multiple times because of the support for Vector layers and non destructive workflows. But I never liked editing or creating images with it. Their text tool is also terrible (or was, I don't know the current state). Just not a good GIMP replacement for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Krita is excellent, but it's for a different task.

    Krita is for image creation. GIMP is for image manipulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    I argue that GIMP is for image creation too. It does even better job at this, depending on what type of work you are doing. I don't like to create pixel (as in retro gaming) graphics in Krita. I am not talented at all, but I can judge the workflow I think. That was just an example off course. We all know Krita excells at creating painted like arts with a pen and brushes simulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments