you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 8 months ago (7 children)

It is a grammar thing. You can have a lot less of a non-count noun, like sand. But you have to have fewer of countable nouns, like loaves of bread, or bakers of bread

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    This is a contested grammar rule that was based on one persons opinion in the late 1700s.

    There are plently of examples in history and modern usage where less and fewer are used interchangably. It is not a fixed part of english grammar as much as an "internet gotcha" that is commonly repeated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Looks better though. I know it looks better because I grew up with the rule, but it does look better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Personally I disagree. "Fewer" is more verbose than "less," so it just looks cumbersome to me in many instances.

    It also irks me a bit, because I know at least some of the instances I see are likely based on the above misunderstanding, not taste.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Non-countable? I think some vampires might disagree.

    I also thought Thor relevant but I can't find anything to support that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments