▲ 1220 ▼ I love password based login (lemmy.world) submitted 8 months ago by bdjegifjdvw@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 154 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (12 children) Yeah what the hell is up with that one? Seems so sketchy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* Passkeys are fine. It's just MTLS but by marketers (if by passcode you mean passkeys. otherwise, what's a passcode?) permalink fedilink source parent [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Passkeys are okay, but your browser and OS want you to use them because you can’t just take a passkey to another platform, you have to create a new one, and it’s a pain in the ass. It’s a lock-in gimmick latching on to a real useful solution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 46 points 8 months ago (6 children) Password managers can hold Passkeys now and they’re portable. Bitwarden stores all of mine, use them on any machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] towerful@programming.dev 13 points 8 months ago* Yeh, I have passkeys in bitwarden. I get it. Once they become ubiquitous, you click "login" your password manager prompts you to select account, and you are in. No password that can be leaked, incorrectly stored, brute forced. Corporations can pre-register company service passkeys for new users. It's like mTLS, except staged. permalink fedilink source parent [–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children) While true, it still means you're locked into only being able to log in from a browser that has the password manager extension installed and logged in. Sometimes I want to log in from another machine, or another OS, or another browser, or even an incognito window that doesn't have access to my extensions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago You can do that without an extension. There's a bunch of different protocols that let you, for example, use your phone as the authenticator. You can log in with your phone on a computer you've never used before by scanning a QR code and credentials never leave your device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 7 months ago That’s an implementation issue, not an inherent problem with passkeys. permalink fedilink source parent [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago It's good but for some reason I can't use them on my degoogled android phone. Doesn't pop up to select.. It thinks I want to use a yuibkey or other device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 8 months ago KeepassDX as well. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 8 months ago That's false. My passkeys sync to my password manager and are available on all my devices permalink fedilink source parent [–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago Ok that makes a lot of sense. It definitely seems like it's more for them than it is for the user's "convenience" permalink fedilink source parent [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago My passkeys are tied to my phone, which I use via the browser and OS. I keep them in my password manager running on the phone. My password manager supports the open spec for securely migrating credentials between vendors. It may be difficult to believe but they want you to use them because they're legitimately significantly better. Users are silly. They blame Microsoft for bad passwords. They blame Google for forgotten passwords. They blame Facebook when they click on a phishing link. They blame apple when apple "lets" someone who they gave their password to see their pictures. They blame apple when they don't let the user in just because they forgot their password and every recovery mechanism. Everyone involved has a significant issue with passwords because they cost them user satisfaction, credibility, or money directly. The reason cross vendor transfer has been slow is because everyone wants to be the leader, since if everyone follows your lead you get to make it work better with your stuff. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* Passkeys are fine. It's just MTLS but by marketers (if by passcode you mean passkeys. otherwise, what's a passcode?) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago* (10 children) Passkeys are okay, but your browser and OS want you to use them because you can’t just take a passkey to another platform, you have to create a new one, and it’s a pain in the ass. It’s a lock-in gimmick latching on to a real useful solution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 46 points 8 months ago (6 children) Password managers can hold Passkeys now and they’re portable. Bitwarden stores all of mine, use them on any machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] towerful@programming.dev 13 points 8 months ago* Yeh, I have passkeys in bitwarden. I get it. Once they become ubiquitous, you click "login" your password manager prompts you to select account, and you are in. No password that can be leaked, incorrectly stored, brute forced. Corporations can pre-register company service passkeys for new users. It's like mTLS, except staged. permalink fedilink source parent [–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children) While true, it still means you're locked into only being able to log in from a browser that has the password manager extension installed and logged in. Sometimes I want to log in from another machine, or another OS, or another browser, or even an incognito window that doesn't have access to my extensions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago You can do that without an extension. There's a bunch of different protocols that let you, for example, use your phone as the authenticator. You can log in with your phone on a computer you've never used before by scanning a QR code and credentials never leave your device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 7 months ago That’s an implementation issue, not an inherent problem with passkeys. permalink fedilink source parent [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago It's good but for some reason I can't use them on my degoogled android phone. Doesn't pop up to select.. It thinks I want to use a yuibkey or other device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 8 months ago KeepassDX as well. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 8 months ago That's false. My passkeys sync to my password manager and are available on all my devices permalink fedilink source parent [–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago Ok that makes a lot of sense. It definitely seems like it's more for them than it is for the user's "convenience" permalink fedilink source parent [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago My passkeys are tied to my phone, which I use via the browser and OS. I keep them in my password manager running on the phone. My password manager supports the open spec for securely migrating credentials between vendors. It may be difficult to believe but they want you to use them because they're legitimately significantly better. Users are silly. They blame Microsoft for bad passwords. They blame Google for forgotten passwords. They blame Facebook when they click on a phishing link. They blame apple when apple "lets" someone who they gave their password to see their pictures. They blame apple when they don't let the user in just because they forgot their password and every recovery mechanism. Everyone involved has a significant issue with passwords because they cost them user satisfaction, credibility, or money directly. The reason cross vendor transfer has been slow is because everyone wants to be the leader, since if everyone follows your lead you get to make it work better with your stuff. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 46 points 8 months ago (6 children) Password managers can hold Passkeys now and they’re portable. Bitwarden stores all of mine, use them on any machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] towerful@programming.dev 13 points 8 months ago* Yeh, I have passkeys in bitwarden. I get it. Once they become ubiquitous, you click "login" your password manager prompts you to select account, and you are in. No password that can be leaked, incorrectly stored, brute forced. Corporations can pre-register company service passkeys for new users. It's like mTLS, except staged. permalink fedilink source parent [–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children) While true, it still means you're locked into only being able to log in from a browser that has the password manager extension installed and logged in. Sometimes I want to log in from another machine, or another OS, or another browser, or even an incognito window that doesn't have access to my extensions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago You can do that without an extension. There's a bunch of different protocols that let you, for example, use your phone as the authenticator. You can log in with your phone on a computer you've never used before by scanning a QR code and credentials never leave your device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 7 months ago That’s an implementation issue, not an inherent problem with passkeys. permalink fedilink source parent [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago It's good but for some reason I can't use them on my degoogled android phone. Doesn't pop up to select.. It thinks I want to use a yuibkey or other device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 8 months ago KeepassDX as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] towerful@programming.dev 13 points 8 months ago* Yeh, I have passkeys in bitwarden. I get it. Once they become ubiquitous, you click "login" your password manager prompts you to select account, and you are in. No password that can be leaked, incorrectly stored, brute forced. Corporations can pre-register company service passkeys for new users. It's like mTLS, except staged. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children) While true, it still means you're locked into only being able to log in from a browser that has the password manager extension installed and logged in. Sometimes I want to log in from another machine, or another OS, or another browser, or even an incognito window that doesn't have access to my extensions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago You can do that without an extension. There's a bunch of different protocols that let you, for example, use your phone as the authenticator. You can log in with your phone on a computer you've never used before by scanning a QR code and credentials never leave your device. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 7 months ago That’s an implementation issue, not an inherent problem with passkeys. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago You can do that without an extension. There's a bunch of different protocols that let you, for example, use your phone as the authenticator. You can log in with your phone on a computer you've never used before by scanning a QR code and credentials never leave your device. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 7 months ago That’s an implementation issue, not an inherent problem with passkeys. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago It's good but for some reason I can't use them on my degoogled android phone. Doesn't pop up to select.. It thinks I want to use a yuibkey or other device. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 8 months ago KeepassDX as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 8 months ago That's false. My passkeys sync to my password manager and are available on all my devices permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago Ok that makes a lot of sense. It definitely seems like it's more for them than it is for the user's "convenience" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago My passkeys are tied to my phone, which I use via the browser and OS. I keep them in my password manager running on the phone. My password manager supports the open spec for securely migrating credentials between vendors. It may be difficult to believe but they want you to use them because they're legitimately significantly better. Users are silly. They blame Microsoft for bad passwords. They blame Google for forgotten passwords. They blame Facebook when they click on a phishing link. They blame apple when apple "lets" someone who they gave their password to see their pictures. They blame apple when they don't let the user in just because they forgot their password and every recovery mechanism. Everyone involved has a significant issue with passwords because they cost them user satisfaction, credibility, or money directly. The reason cross vendor transfer has been slow is because everyone wants to be the leader, since if everyone follows your lead you get to make it work better with your stuff. permalink fedilink source parent