you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The linked Reuters article provides a bit more context:

The jury agreed with the plaintiffs that Alphabet's Google (GOOGL.O), was liable for sending and receiving information from the devices without permission while they were idle, causing what the lawsuit had called "mandatory and unavoidable burdens shouldered by Android device users for Google's benefit."

[…]

Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that the company would appeal, and that the verdict "misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    opens new tab

    the verdict "misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices."

    Ummmm maybe I’m misunderstanding but how on earth is opening a new tab critical to security and performance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments