502
It's rude to show AI output to people | Alex Martsinovich (distantprovince.by)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -16 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Uh huh. And at the same time, I'm frequently told "it's the deception that we hate! Don't claim you did something if an AI actually did it!"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Deception is bad too, wtf are you talking about?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [+] -17 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    I'm pointing out that people find excuses to hate on AI regardless of what you do with it. Makes it pointless to compromise or otherwise try to satisfy them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    What value is it adding at any point? If I wanted to use chat gpt, I'd go off myself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Who said it needs to add value? The article claims that showing AI-generated content to others without them explicitly asking for it is inherently bad - even when you tell them it's AI. So basically: if you share it without mentioning the source you're deceiving people, and if you do mention it it's still bad... because reasons.

    To me that just sounds like an ideological stance more than a logical one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Value in the abstract sense of "desirable thing" not necessarily monetary.

    If I'm having a conversation within and ask them about a thing, I'd much rather an "I don't know" than whatever the plagiarism engine's facsimile of an opinion is.

    Lot of people have strong opinions about ai, many of them very bad. Because what should be a novelty or maybe a part of a more sophisticated system instead of the half assed implementation that it currently is. At the low low price of stealing from artists and fucking the environment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You don't have to use it. Other people who do find value in it use it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Ok. But the context is that of a conversation. Where is the value sharing there?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -7 points 8 months ago

    OP provided no context whatsoever.

    Over the years there have been so many conversations I've been in online where someone asked something where the answer was trivially found with Google or some other search engine, but the conversation was interesting so I would Google it and provide the answer as part of my response. Is that blockworthy too?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    It does multiple bad things.

    Saying "aha, you used to say you hated deception, but now you hate another bad thing" is not a gotcha.

    I dislike many bad things, but you seem locked into defending AI at all costs. Please go back to Reddit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •