you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Well, I prefer Arch, but a major factor in that preference is the fact that some software I rely on for my work is very hard to find on other distributions and that creates unnecessary hassle for me.

Fedora and Debian/Ubuntu are both pretty solid choices for a base OS, but Fedora might be more robust in the long run.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Fedora is not really a community distro, the way Debian is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Fedora is also one of the most US-cocksucking distros of the bunch, what with being RedHat-derivative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    It's not a Red Hat derivative. It's upstream of Red Hat.

    In a way Fedora is like interim Ubuntu releases, CentOS Stream is like LTS Ubuntu releases, and RHEL is like Ubuntu Pro. So if you want to stay away from a US company, Fedora isn't a great idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    The main example I'm thinking of is SageMath, which is available in the default Pacman repositories but is not maintained as a package in Debian or Fedora.

    You can build it from scratch, and I've done this before on Fedora systems, but it's much easier to install the latest version with a single command.

  • source
  • parent