Source: OAG Data

Interesting that California's was higher than Florida/Texas until 2007 and 2015.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Some thoughts:

  • Florida had a striking increase between 2003 and 2008 that isn’t reflected by California or Texas. Did something specific happen in Florida in that timeframe?

  • Texas seems to have been on a long-term downward trend until 2013 (while Florida was spiking). The subsequent upward trend is mirrored by Florida, but not California.

  • What does “age-adjusted” mean?

  • Does “per 100,000” refer to the entire population, or the population under 25? If the former, could some of the differences be accounted for by changing demographics?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Does “per 100,000” refer to the entire population, or the population under 25? If the former, could some of the differences be accounted for by changing demographics?

    That’s what age-adjustment prevents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So if I understand that right, the “per 100,000” figures aren’t for the exact populations, but for what the populations would be if the age groups were re-weighted to keep the age demographics constant?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment