you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

The argument "food is free in nature and should therefore be free" isn't a good argument. There is however one to be made for "with the level of technological advancement we've achieved at present, food shouldn't be as inaccessible as it currently is"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 2 points 8 months ago

    Right, but I have seen massive arguments on Lemmy over this topic. The argument you made is actually well thought out and makes sense, while the one I mentioned is stupid and doesn't withstand even the smallest amount of basic thought.

  • source
  • parent