you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 80 points 8 months ago (63 children)

Of course not. We have only two choices of party:

  1. The Fascist party.

  2. The party that tells you to vote for them lest the Fascists win, but when elected, does nothing to fight the Fascists, reverse their worst atrocities, or prevent them from coming back to power.

  • source
  • hideshow 63 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    when elected, does nothing to fight the Fascists, reverse their worst atrocities, or prevent them from coming back to power

    Yep. If Democrats ever gain power again, watch them keep ICE pretty much the same way it is now, keep most of Trump's tariffs, not restore SNAP or USAID funding to previous levels, etc, etc, etc.

    We just have to be grateful that the lesser evil party didn't add too many new atrocities before they calmly and politely cede power to the fascists again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago

    Exactly. Could one of the blue MAGA folks let me know when Newsom publicly announces he supports completely dismantling DHS and rolling back the post-9/11 surveillance state? You cannot seriously pretend to want to fight fascism if dismantling the tools of the fascists isn't the first thing you intend to do when in power.

    It has some serious Lord of the Rings vibes. The surveillance state and the unconstitutional powers created after 9/11 are this immensely powerful tool created for evil ends. But after the evil is defeated, the nominally good guys choose to not to dismantle the evil tools, but to keep them, telling themselves that they will be used for good. Except they cannot be used for good, as they are fundamentally evil. Meanwhile I'm over here shouting, "cast it into the fire!" But they decide to keep it every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Well, to be honest, if the choices between being fucked hard and fucked softly….

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    Except that attitude pretends that the election in front of you is the only election that will ever happen ever again. It's a short-sighted view that leads us to exactly where we are now. We've had 30 years of Democrats telling everyone "don't boycott this election. This is the most important one in history. If you don't vote for us, democracy is dead forever. I know we're not really going to do anything to change things, but what choice do you have?"

    In retrospect, we would have been a lot better off today if in 2016 the entire left wing of the Democratic party just boycotted the election entirely. The fact that Hillary came close to winning is the only reason the neoliberal wing was able to retain any credibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I boycotted 2016 and look where we are now. I was young and stupid and should have toed the line. I fucking hate Hillary and everything she represents, but I could not comprehend at the time what Trump represented

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I was verbally harassed by a dozen picture perfect Karen's in a highschool gym for standing on the Bernie side during the 2016 caucus. They did not make a guy want to side with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Nope. Being told “it’s her turn” was it for me. You had a pro Wall Street, pro War candidate versus Bernie. I think a lot of young people either didn’t vote or switched sides that year.

    Telling your future voting pool to shut up and take more austerity and less opportunity so Wall Street can get rich ain’t it DNC

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I voted green party that year and it's the vote I regret the least. I went on to vote for Biden and then Harris

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Thank you. Considered alternatives many times, but mostly in primaries (because it only helps the worst people win in general).

    I don't think most people even understand what a primary is (and that we're having them literally right now). Not happy with elected reps? Go vote, pick your team (90% don't bother). Mail-in if disabled (any state). Check out candidates online. Lots of alts and progressives on primary ballots (on Dem side).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (51 children)

    It's like you have absolutely no understanding of how the system actually works, and have chosen to ignore history.

    The GOP is never going to cede one inch to the Dems on anything, ever. Obama picked the ACA plan because it was based on a GOP idea and they fought him tooth and nail until the final vote. Then they turned around and demanded the Supreme Court abolish it.

    The only way you'll get any change under the current system is to elect a Dem super majority in every election for the next fifty years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    Obama picked the ACA plan because it was based on a GOP idea and they fought him tooth and nail until the final vote. Then they turned around and demanded the Supreme Court abolish it.

    The only way you’ll get any change under the current system is to elect a Dem super majority in every election for the next fifty years.

    They had a Dem supermajority during that time. And what did they do with it? They bent over backwards trying to 'reach across the aisle' and giving the GOP every single thing they asked for.

    Expect the same thing if they come into power again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    And what is your alternative?

    What should we do in the 2026 elections?

    Please provide a detailed plan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah but you only want a nice detailed plan so you can take a shit all over it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago* (39 children)

    YOU have chosen to ignore history. And how typically in authoritarian takeovers, the first step to fighting the takeover is to abandon the captured opposition party and to start fresh with something new. A popular front is usually needed to defeat them. Authoritarians often let toothless opposition parties continue to operate. And there are always blind fools like yourself who insist that they must be supported, though they are just another tool of the autocrat.

    The only way you’ll get any change under the current system is to elect a Dem super majority in every election for the next fifty years.

    This shows you are not a serious person. If that is your solution, then I can only conclude that you actually support Trump and the Fascist party.

    Democrats are not a real opposition party. They are the potemkin opposition, fully captured by the Fascists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (37 children)

    So, what exactly is your plan for the 2026 election?

    How exactly are you going to counter Trump?

    Be specific and provide as many details as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (15 children)

    Fuck elections. General strike until our demands are met.

    Hold their precious 'economy' hostage while we still can -- before they replace us all with robots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    Nice idea.

    Now provide the details of how you do it.

    It's easy to say things, not that easy to make them happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    1: Gather a group of people. (I've got a few, need a lot more.)

    2: Come up with a list of demands those people can mostly agree on. (I've got ideas, of course, but so does everybody. It's not my place to unilaterally decide what the strike's demands will be.)

    3: Mutual aid networks to assist people who get fired from their jobs (or worse) in retaliation for participating in the strike. Build emergency caches of food, household essentials, arms, and medical supplies. Organize temporary shelter plans for anyone made homeless by participating in the strike. (I've got plenty of food to share if necessary, and I have a camper trailer in my back yard someone can stay in if necessary. And I've got a bunch of old lumber and building supplies I could slap together into some additional makeshift huts if really necessary -- they wouldn't have indoor plumbing, but they'd at least have a roof, walls, and heat. I could support 2 or 3 people easily. Maybe 5 to 10 in a pinch.)

    4: Announce the strike. Begin withholding labor and minimizing all economic participation until the demands from Step 2 are met. (Not only refuse to sell your labor, but also refuse to buy anything, as much as possible. Also, for good measure, withdraw all your money from the bank so they can't collect interest on it.) (This does not mean that participants will 'do no work' and just sit around all day. You still have work -- supporting the strike. Work in a food kitchen to support those going hungry because they're on strike. Deliver food and supplies to strikers who can't make it to that kitchen. Build temporary shelters for strikers who need them. Provide security against the inevitable strike-busting violence. Etc.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    You can start working on mutual aid today. it's not a wish list, it's something you can actually incorporate into your life. At a bare minimum treat it like church and participate for at least a couple of hours a week.

    Ive been involved with a group making free food for the community for eight years. This is going to be a generational struggle. You already think that it would take 50 years of Democratic super majorities to accomplish anything, what's a decade or two of working to build robust community organizations that would facilitate a general strike?

    And the icing on the cake is you can still vote for your democratic super majority; mutual aid/community organizing and voting are not mutually exclusive although I have to say voting is a very passive activity you might do a couple times a year a most. Building community organizations and mutual aid networks is much more involved and takes diligence and continual effort.

    There's no reason you can't do both. If you are serious about fixing this country we are going to need to do everything we possibly can and then sustain that effort until the job is done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Oh my goodness, you are one tracking on elections so hard. You ignore everything I say and circle right back around to voting. Alright I'll humor you.

    Our plan for 2026 election:

    -Vote in primary if applicable

    -Vote in general

    Great, super easy to get all of our planning done. It took all of five seconds and when it comes time to actually vote it will take less than an hour. I don't understand why we need to plan something this simple so far in advance but now we've got a plan.

    Now that thats out of the way we can focus on more important things like finding ways to build more robust communities and serve our neighbors in need. The Democrats aren't coming to save anyone for literally years, there are hungry, unhoused, and unemployed people that need help now.

    Do you even have a plan for what you will do if the Democrats don't win the election? What about if the Democrats win the election but still screw the working class? Are you going to wait 50 years to see if voting Democrat works or not before you try anything else? Given the Democrats performance over the past 50 years I'd say starting and stopping your political engagement at voting and electoralism is magical thinking, a hail Mary, all eggs in one basket, a recipe for disaster.

    Say it with me, voting and mutual aid are not mutually exclusive. You can do both at the same time. Mutual aid/community organizing takes hard work on a regular basis while voting is a passive affair that takes a couple of hours a year at most. Of the two spending more of your focus and energy on the lower effort, passive option is a recipe for failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    No financing. No leadership.

    Financing corrupts, leadership is corruptible.

    We need a bottom-up movement without that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Read ‘The Autobiography Of Malcolm X.’

    He said that there’s no achievement without leadership.

    A leader says you have to have leadership. Big fucking surprise there.

    I say we don't need leadership. Leaders can be corrupted. Leaders can be assassinated.

    Remind me again what happened to Malcom X.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Well ... yes.

    I am an anarchist, after all.

    I mean, look at the world around you right now. Look what became of your revered leaders in history. How's this whole following leaders thing working out for you so far? Why do you think it will be any different going forward?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    you can’t follow the teachings of the anarchists who came before you. Therefore you can’t be an anarchist.

    lol, Anarchism isn't about following teachings of others. That's completely optional. The entire point of Anarchism is to reject authority. It would be self-defeating if we set up prominent anarchists of the past as authority figures.

    You can read their stuff and learn from them, if you want to. Learn from them, don't follow them. And that might help. But, again, completely optional.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    You guys should do like the French, really. Revolt. Anything short of that won’t achieve shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    How brave of you to volunteer other people to attack the barricades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Your people are threatening to invade my neighbouring country. Americans made this mess. Americans get to fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    Trump isn’t the problem. Lop his head off and you’ll have achieved catharsis but it won’t be a solution to any problems. A lot more heads need to roll before anything is solved.

    You can’t vote your way out of it because the system is built for those with money. You need to change the entire system and no one who is currently benefiting from that system will aid you in that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    Nah, you're arguing in bad faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Satisfy my curiosity.

    Exactly which words demonstrated by 'bad faith?'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    It's your attitude and it's as obvious as a zit on your nose. Nobody here owes you anything, and you've been treated with kid gloves by some very kind, intelligent people. I am neither of those things. Sit down, shut up, listen, and maybe learn something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    I'm not going to waste my breath re explaining what smart people already have. Read their comments, touch grass, and maybe go volunteer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    And you would have said it isn’t a plan it’s a wish list to Santa. So it would have been a waste. Get outta here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    That isn’t what I said tho. I just said what you said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)