you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Actually, quite the opposite is true for colonialism. Colonizers often chose a "favourite" group of local people and gave them a tiny sliver of power on the condition, that they help oppress everyone else. I'm not judging that btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Right but if you follow that power dynamic up the chain the cause would still be the group that picked the " favorite".

    This doesn't resolve the "favorite" group from their role, but rather distributes blame to all involved

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Moreover, the intentional pitting of Group A against Group B in colonialism is specifically to make it so that Groups A and B never realize that they could overtake their colonizers by cooperating.

  • source
  • parent