this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026

47 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

privacy@lemmy.ml

51,918 readers

4,670 active

593 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago

moderators

Yayannick@lemmy.ml

ranok@sopuli.xyz

mastodon age verification (cyberpunk.lol)

submitted 8 months ago by vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/02/connecting-the-world-through-thriving-online-communities/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 4 points 8 months ago* (16 children)

I just think this is a logistical dead-end for regulators who may rely on the chilling effect of the thought of being targeted rather than actually being targeted. Unless the Fediverse somehow becomes massive, I don't see that it'll ever enter their eyes. Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws, and the most hostile to any threats from foreign regulators (see again the 4chan example).

parent

hideshow 16 child comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago (15 children)

Especially as many places will be based in the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws

uh, what?

parent

hideshow 15 child comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social -2 points 8 months ago (14 children)

Yes? USA is the least likely to do this. Porn laws in various states don't apply to social media.

Other attempts have been stuck in legislative hell, been unenforced or have court cases challenging their legality (Mississipi)

parent

hideshow 14 child comments

[–] Twongo@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

US Tech firms profit the most from it, the verification data lands on some palantir server - as the recent discord fiasco implied.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago

Whether they do so optionally is a different thing entirely, to be fair.

parent

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (11 children)

Not even two weeks later, California is making OS level age verification a thing.

parent

hideshow 11 child comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (10 children)

I'm not even sure how that is remotely enforceable, although this also is a somewhat different thing to what this thread is about.

parent

hideshow 10 child comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 8 months ago* (9 children)

You may want to look into what the legal requirements actually are, and how it changes who is liable. It is outright draconian.

Essentially, it requires the OS to find out the age of the user, and then inform ALL software that is run by API. Any software that theoretically could use the data, and still allows a child to see something they should not have, will be liable.

You claimed that the US was the least likely to do this sort of thing...

Instead, despite the incompetence, they are clearly spearheading this globally along with the UK. Making it most decidedly the first place that will have to deal with this crap.

Not the last.

parent

hideshow 9 child comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago* (8 children)

Yes, but if the OS was not designed in California and you are not based in California (you're not Windows, basically) - I fail to see how they can meaningfully compel anyone to follow this. Moreover, even if an OS somehow could know the users age - that doesn't automatically mean all other software that exists automatically reads it and responds to it as necessary.

Does the law compel anyone making software to recognise this?

parent

hideshow 8 child comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 8 months ago* (7 children)

Windows, and any other OS will be illegal in California unless it implements this.

Apple, for one, is headquartered in California.

So, the OS wont work until the user verifies their age somehow.

Moreover, even if an OS somehow could know the users age - that doesn't automatically mean all other software that exists automatically reads it and responds to it as necessary. Does the law compel anyone making software to recognise this?

Did you not read my comment? Anyone writing software for an OS that implements this, can be sued (in California) if their application ignores the API signals from the OS and allows access to age-restricted content.

Or is your argument really "this won't affect linux, so it doesn't matter" ? At the very least, FOSS development by anyone in California will be a problem, as the law quite literally names "persons" as potentially liable.

The reality remains, the US is the most thirsty for this kind of thing. Not the least.

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (6 children)

Windows, and any other OS will be illegal in California unless it implements this.

Right, as I said - I just don't see how this is meaningfully enforceable. It's a complete farce. It's on the level of the Online Safety Act it being enforceable.

Apple, for one, is headquartered in California.

Oh, I forgot Apple. Sure.

But there are many other OS. How on earth can they credibly enforce this?

Did you not read my comment? Anyone writing software for an OS that implements this, can be sued (in California) if it ignores the API signals from the OS and allows access to age-restricted content.

Yeah, this is just not meaningfully enforceable. Big companies will follow, but it would mostly be ignored by everyone else.

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 8 months ago* (5 children)

Is your argument really "this won't affect linux, so it doesn't matter" ? At the very least, FOSS development by anyone in California will be a problem, as the law quite literally names "persons" as potentially liable.

The reality remains, the US is the most thirsty for this kind of thing. Not the least.

And they are already working on an even more overreaching version that will close loopholes in the current legalese.

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

Is your argument really “this won’t affect linux, so it doesn’t matter” ? At the very least, FOSS development by anyone in California will be a problem, as the law quite literally names “persons” as potentially liable.

I'm taking the position that this is largely unenforceable at a software and OS level beyond larger players that come from California or specifically do a lot of trade in California.

The reality remains, the US is the most thirsty for this kind of thing. Not the least.

This specifically is quite different to most other efforts. Not sure if it might get constitutionally tested.

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

...

So this is not a concern to you?

The fact that there are people in leadership positions that want this, and have reasons why they want this, is below note. And not worth opposing?

This will lead to infrastructure, that should not exist, existing.

That it can be avoided is not a solution. It should not be built in the first place.

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

It is a concern, I just don't know how it's meaningfully enforceable at scale. Just like OSA. What do you want me to do about it personally?

I never supported the idea.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 8 months ago* (1 child)

I'd like you to realize that "the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws" is literally the opposite of current reality.

They are making some of the greatest efforts to make legally mandated user and age tracking a thing, as well as legally mandated user identity based content-gating.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago

I’d like you to realize that “the USA who is the least likely country to implement these laws” is literally the opposite of current reality.

In comparison to Europe/UK/AUS which is far further along this road (and implemented social media age requirements), absolutely. Also, apparently it's just a checkbox as far as this particular California law goes.

parent