Personal Finance 💸

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[+] freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz [S] -13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Please read the linked article before commenting. Specifically, the title:

“All U.S. Social Security numbers may need to be changed following a massive breach that is already being investigated as a national threat”

It’s only correct to call this “talking out your ass” if you intend to claim that an act of Congress were impossible.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You and I both know they don’t consider this a breach.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[+] freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz [S] -6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Who’s they? By “they” you mean government. That’s not an atomic unit. The gov has many govs therein and those govs are not aligned. Read the article.

“A filing summarized on Representative John Larson’s website states that DOGE workers used the third party service Cloudflare in March 2025 in a way that violated Social Security’s own security policies, and that DOGE employees attempted to pass sensitive personal records to an outside advocacy group seeking to overturn election results.”

…

“The Department of Justice has since admitted in another case that earlier statements to the courts about DOGE’s access were inaccurate.”

…

“A press release from the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees describes how Justice Department filings acknowledged that individuals’ personal data had been disclosed to third parties using a non-government server, and that DOGE operatives entered Social Security systems without proper authority, bypassing safeguards and putting bank accounts, health records, wage histories, and immigration status at risk.”

So policy violations, inaccurate testimony, and improper authority.. clearly some key gov agencies see this as a data breach.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

The gov has many govs therein and those govs are not aligned.

The government has many governments there in and those governments are not aligned? I know those words but not how you used them. English is clearly not your first language so kindly stop trying to start shit here. It's sad how hard you are pushing something that doesn't exist and doesn't work like you think.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz [S] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You cannot comprehend English written by someone whose first language is English.
You cannot meaningfully articulate in English why you cannot comprehend it.
You don’t know that “therein” is spelled as a single word.

You’re clearly the one struggling with English.

There are literally thousands of governments within the US. The US loves to create new govs. If you cannot grasp that, then you simply will not be able to understand the problem with trying to consider “the gov” as a singular entity in this context. In the very least, you should try to understand that there are 3 branches of government. From there, copious jurisdictions divided by geography and scope of law.

Do a search on “ICE Minnesota” if you want to understand hard and fast how govs in the US can be unaligned.

I am not going to write a whole book right here so you can understand. Go back to school.