The "big switch" has ended up being a lot less big than originally promised. I'm really happy we now have a turn up and go service - or at least every 10 minutes - on the lines going through the Metro Tunnel (the Munnel), but feels really silly we haven't brought more drivers on board to run services at least every 10 minutes across the network, and upped all bus routes to the same frequency.

There's a great map that Taitset made showing sections of the metro network which could already do 10 minute running.

My mum, who's in her late 60s, told me of growing up in [European city]. She interchanged 2 times between 2 trains and a bus on her way too highschool. Her and her friends didn't like the bus because it only came every 10 minutes. In the 1970s.

It's a bit embarrassing to me how bad our frequency is, given our massive population.

It would be great if we could convince our government or MPs holding the balance of power at the next state election to invest in a larger workforce to achieve the frequency PTV needs to thrive.

Keen to hear others thoughts on the "Big Switch".

P.S. I've talked to multiple colleagues who live on the lines who literally didn't know about the "Big Switch" until I told them about it, 2 days beforehand.

Cross-posted to !melbourne@aussie.zone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Nah I feel you. It feels like we're kinda just tinkering around the edges, plus level crossing removals (I do actually rather love sky rail, in the context of the local area. The extra greenspace and amenities is really nice).

I really hope we can get more through running my reconfiguring the loop as you say.

In general I think we need to stop increasing the size of Melbourne and densify. Though, unless that's coupled with building reform (bring back public inspectors and actually throw the book at dodgy developers. In addition to much needed owners corporation Act reform), then that's not gonna go well

It's my biggest worry about the Activity Centres policy from the DTP/VicGov. I'm generally for it because our city is too spread out, ai just think it's going to go very poorly because it'll be a money grab rather than positive urban development.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment