Pulse of Truth

2,615 readers

1,102 active

15 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

Commenting rules:

Be respectful.
No bigotry (including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia).
No pornography.
Nothing illegal.
More rules will be added when necessary

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

krogoth@infosec.pub

After a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by name (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by lemmydev2@infosec.pub [B] to c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One developer is struggling with the social implications of a drive-by AI character attack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago

Yup, and Ars has followed up with an initial explanation at https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/ . Hopefully they'll go into greater detail about what happened.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent