Windows hit its lowest market share in decades, Microsoft lost $400 billion in a week, and now their own president is admitting they need to fix the OS. SteamOS and Linux aren't waiting around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 129 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (22 children)

Microsoft has been built on a 40 year old tech monopoly under which it has fully leveraged abusive anti-consumer and anti-user tactics that have kept it there. It’s amazing they have lasted this long while accreting so much hate. This greed, their creepy starry-eyed cult-like adoption of LLMs, and the destruction of user trust by the outright THEFT of user data will be their downfall. You simply cannot vibe code a good operating system.

Watching one of the largest corporations ever conceived BEG users to use OneDrive and Edge, then surreptitiously change settings and install software to make it so is mind boggling. They simply cannot STAND that you won’t let them train models on your data, glowing bright green with envy at Google and Apple’s closed hardware systems.

I’ll say it again and again, I would have happily paid for Windows 10, but they gave it away for free, then marched an unwilling user base to 11 only for it to be the worst OS since Windows Vista. Extreme wealth breeds insanity.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    You simply cannot vibe code a good operating system.

    Hell, they weren't doing too well before that, either. The whole creepy "we know better" vibe was pretty noticeable before the advent of LLMs too - although of course it's made it a ton worse. But they were always inept and douchy to boot.

    As the joke goes, "Do you think Microsoft understands consent? Yes / Maybe yes later"

    (Personally I think 11 is way worse than Vista - in isolation, relative to the previous one, morally, somehow UX wise, pretty much any metric you want.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I have to agree. Vista was a dud, but there were a number of legitimate improvements made over Windows XP. Windows 11 is just a worse Windows 10. Other than maybe tabs in the Explorer, I can't think of anything they've improved and a whole lot they made worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Exactly. Vista was rushed and buggy but that's, y'know, par for the course really. I think there was a time in the 00's where they really wanted to be extremely optimistic about Moore's law-style performance gains, and for some reason they thought they could aim ahead of the curve. Cue Vista actually running like dogshit even aside from outright crashes and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    They believe they have a captive audience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    My switch to Linux has been so easy. I'm not some high end IT guy. If you can install windows from a USB, you can install Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, it's super simple.

    I'm selling a pile of computers I bought off auction. People are choosing Fedora over Windows 60% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    I just installed kubuntu on a couple of 4th gen Microsoft surfaces rather than upgrade to win11. I needed to install a little extra for the touch screen but it was easy to find and easy to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Surface 4 sucks on w11. Mint is also a great choice. That's what I'm using on mine at home. My only complaint is hardware, either the battery is finally falling or it has weird parasitic draw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    In the corporate world, they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You are completely right. That will be true until Linux is proven to have enough utility and be able to run enough the software end users need. Active directory is killer, but there are alternatives.

    It's a shame Novell is circling the drain, as it does have the ability to manage Windows and Linux machines in a similar network. If Microsoft fucks up hard enough and the opportunity is there, we might see an exodus. European governments are supposedly pioneering this now.

    I'm aware this is still incredibly improbable, but the possibility is growing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    What alternatives to AD are there in the Linux world?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Open Enterprise Server / Zenworks is one option. It's actually the predecessor to AD. From my experience it is the most polished option. There are several foss implementations of LDAP, but nothing I'm aware of (or looked for) in the enterprise scale.

  • source
  • parent