you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 14 points 9 months ago (5 children)

In fact, this garbage blogspam should go on the AI coding community that was made specifically because the subscribers of the programming community didn't want it here.

This article may mention AI coding but I made a very considered decision to post it in here because the primary focus is the author's relationship to programming, and hence worth sharing with the wider programming community.

Considering how many people have voted this up, I would take that as a sign I posted it in the appropriate community. If you don't feel this post is appropriate in this community, I'm happy to discuss that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I think there's room for people to try to grapple with the fact that, for good or ill, the industry is being impacted by LLM code assistants right now in a significant way. That doesn't mean this isn't a tech craze, or a flash in the pan, or a hype bubble that has gotten huge. And whether or not the bubble pops, I don't think it's unreasonable to think that code writing tools comparable to what we have now will be around for awhile, again for good or ill. This seems like a dev grappling, not sneaky AI booster bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)