you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Public money of one jurisdiction shouldn't necessarily pay for things so a different jurisdiction gets them for free. It's an opportunity for the city to generate some revenue to offset other costs. Or it could be structured as a non-profit effort to develop open source, paid by ongoing grants from a number of cities that would use it - that would be nice, but difficult to orchestrate .

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago*

    See my reply to the other comment.

    I really do believe that the most sensible way to formalise it is just requiring publically funded code to be open source. Requires less complexity than co-op, and works out the same if enough countries opt-in.

    See this as an example:

    https://github.com/Governikus/AusweisApp/

    https://commission.europa.eu/about/departments-and-executive-agencies/digital-services/open-source-strategy-history/european-union-public-licence_en

  • source
  • parent