you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The actual proposal to Congress in that article reads...

"adopt a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution pursuant to article V of the United States Constitution to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms."

That's not removing 2a. The comment of repealing was just that, a comment. That specific comment didn't make it to the official request to Congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    Really...you do realize that amending it is just an easier way to basically say it's null and void.

    On top of that, you asked I provided. Let's stop pretending that there aren't dems who want it repealed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Since when does amending ANYTHING mean removing it?

    You didn't provide anything, the linked article didn't support your claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Since when does amending ANYTHING mean removing it?

    Lol, the 21st voids the 18th...open a damn history book for once kid.

    You didn't provide anything, the linked article didn't support your claim.

    I literally did, you just don't like that there are elected dems who want to ban civilians from owning firearms. All so you can continue the bullshit from the DNC "we don't want to take your guns".

  • source
  • parent