you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

There isn't really competing theories. The reason why its done is very well known, and others have stated it: fighting provides immediate consequences to players that break the moral code of the game.

Whether its a good thing or not is debatable, for sure though. I'd personally argue that if there was a better policy to achieve the same results, we would use it, and fighting actually has gone down as a result of high definition cameras recording more of the games. Players get away with less bad actions and there are less fights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Well two mutually incompatible claims, then. And I just don't really believe in either one. Most hockey leagues don't have fighting and there's no more bad behaviour. It seems to be mainly a North American thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I'm supposed to just assume you are right about the "no more bad behavior" part?

    Perhaps american sports incentivize immoral play and cheating simply by paying athletes more, and so fighting has emerged to counter this. Hard to say, we aren't able to measure fightings impact on the game in a useful way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment