124
Not Kidding! Bash Shell Manual is Part of Epstein Files 🫣 (itsfoss.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

When I first saw a tweet about the Bash Reference Manual being part of Epstein files, I simply thought of it as a joke.

And then there were more tweets. As a Linux user and an open source enthusiast, I was curious and I had to find out if there was any truth in it.

The truth is that indeed Bash Reference Manual is part of the Epstein Files released by the U.S. Department of Justice. You can access it here.

NOTHING IS SAFE LMFAO

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

No, they have been ordered to release all the files arising from activities related to Epstein. Relevance to criminal activity was not a criteria. So if they cloned a storage device he had a Bash manual on, a Bash manual must be released.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    At some point I saw images posted on what was supposedly Epsteins server setup, and given the disgusting shit they were up to it’s not even a little surprising he would keep it on hardware he fully controls. So of course there will be some technical documentation in there.

    At the same time I’m kind of shocked how much of these emails happens on seemingly regular @gmail.com or @yahoo.com addresses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    At the same time I’m kind of shocked how much of these emails happens on seemingly regular @gmail.com or @yahoo.com addresses.

    So much for Snowden's revelations about PRISM. All that digital surveilance and yet they don't catch the pedos and traffickers with it. Curious.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    All that digital surveilance and yet they don’t catch the pedos and traffickers with it. Curious.

    Well yeah, he's probably on a filterlist at NSA so his emails were not logged.

    Same thing happened to the Labour adjustments to the review on dragnet surveilance in the UK. They just added "Union members can't be tracked" instead of fucking doing something decent.

    And we're seeing how the current Labour party in power is behaving regarding this; by having had Peter "Epstein is my great friend" Mandelson in positions of power until people started to care too much.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent