16
Kilobyte is precisely 1000 bytes (waspdev.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I'm not all about jamming a random i into terminology that was already well defined decades ago. But hey, you go for it if that's what you prefer.

By the way, 'for FTW' makes about as much sense as saying 'ATM machine', it's redundant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    KiB was defined decades ago... Way back in 1999. Before that it was not well defined. kb could mean binary or decimal depending on what or who was doing the measurements.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    And? I started programming back in 1996, back when most computer storage and memory measurements were generally already well defined, around the base 2 binary system.

    Floppy disks were about the only exception, 1.44MB was indeed base 10, but built on top of base 2 for cluster size. It was indeed a clusterfuck. 1.44MB was technically 1.38MiB when using modern terms.

    I do wonder sometimes how many buffer overflow errors and such are the result of 'programmers' declaring their arrays in base 10 (1000) rather than base 2^10 (1024)... 🤔

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent