you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 9 months ago (10 children)

I mean if you make your whole identity around hating something, then you're obviously going to hate it no matter what.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Same could be said with people hyping something.

    This tech might be good for tripping on shrooms, but as with other applications it is being forced on, lacks the planning and stability to be useful yet.

    One year is overéy optimistic. Maybe 5 - 10.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago

    The rate of improvement every few months has been absolutely incredible. Given we already have open source stuff like this, 5-10 years seems rather pessimistic. But even that isn't really that long of a time frame in the grand scheme of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Maybe, you could pay no attention to it at all and it’d still be rubbish in a year

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

    Yup, absolutely no visible progress happening with this tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, it's not?

    Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces.

    I'll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments