▲ 51 ▼ Gaming market melts down after Google reveals new AI game design tool — Project Genie crashes stocks for Roblox, Nintendo, CD Projekt Red, and more (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 9 months ago by carrotfox@piefed.social to c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 12 points 9 months ago (11 children) Yeah righto, I bet it’s still rubbish permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (10 children) I mean if you make your whole identity around hating something, then you're obviously going to hate it no matter what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (1 child) Same could be said with people hyping something. This tech might be good for tripping on shrooms, but as with other applications it is being forced on, lacks the planning and stability to be useful yet. One year is overéy optimistic. Maybe 5 - 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago The rate of improvement every few months has been absolutely incredible. Given we already have open source stuff like this, 5-10 years seems rather pessimistic. But even that isn't really that long of a time frame in the grand scheme of things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago (7 children) Maybe, you could pay no attention to it at all and it’d still be rubbish in a year permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (6 children) Yup, absolutely no visible progress happening with this tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (5 children) I mean, it's not? Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces. I'll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (10 children) I mean if you make your whole identity around hating something, then you're obviously going to hate it no matter what. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (1 child) Same could be said with people hyping something. This tech might be good for tripping on shrooms, but as with other applications it is being forced on, lacks the planning and stability to be useful yet. One year is overéy optimistic. Maybe 5 - 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago The rate of improvement every few months has been absolutely incredible. Given we already have open source stuff like this, 5-10 years seems rather pessimistic. But even that isn't really that long of a time frame in the grand scheme of things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago (7 children) Maybe, you could pay no attention to it at all and it’d still be rubbish in a year permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (6 children) Yup, absolutely no visible progress happening with this tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (5 children) I mean, it's not? Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces. I'll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (1 child) Same could be said with people hyping something. This tech might be good for tripping on shrooms, but as with other applications it is being forced on, lacks the planning and stability to be useful yet. One year is overéy optimistic. Maybe 5 - 10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago The rate of improvement every few months has been absolutely incredible. Given we already have open source stuff like this, 5-10 years seems rather pessimistic. But even that isn't really that long of a time frame in the grand scheme of things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago The rate of improvement every few months has been absolutely incredible. Given we already have open source stuff like this, 5-10 years seems rather pessimistic. But even that isn't really that long of a time frame in the grand scheme of things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago (7 children) Maybe, you could pay no attention to it at all and it’d still be rubbish in a year permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (6 children) Yup, absolutely no visible progress happening with this tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (5 children) I mean, it's not? Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces. I'll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (6 children) Yup, absolutely no visible progress happening with this tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (5 children) I mean, it's not? Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces. I'll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (5 children) I mean, it's not? Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces. I'll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) There's been stunning progress happening every year here, and people are in fact designing new models all the time. The whole thing with stuff like Genie is a result of new models in fact. The whole idea of world models is a significant step forward from LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Is it, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes it is because it actually creates a model of the world which LLMs do not do. Are you just trying to be contrarian for the sake of it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] msage@programming.dev 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I just don't think your interpretation of the situation is correct, that's all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago you're welcome to your opinion permalink fedilink source parent