you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

That's some weaselly circular argument you're engaging in there.

Your use of the word "just" implies that having people called "citizens" is inherently and self-evidently better than having people called "inhabitants"; which you're then plugging into a proof-by-definition to paper over the fact that you haven't actually made any kind of case for why it's better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 9 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    In reality, a foreign patron walks in, makes an order, and then you shoot them in the face.

    You guys don’t care if they came here legally. You don’t care if they are refugees who only want to be back home. You don’t care if they are true asylum seekers. You don’t care if they follow every letter of the law.

    You yell “don’t take my share!” Buddy, they didn’t take your share. The classes above you are laughing at your gullibility.

    Your words are hollow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    It's an advantage for the people who get a place to sit and eat.

    And an advantage for the people who work in that restaurant if they're ever tired or out when it starts to rain that that they can rest or shelter in any other restaurants near by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    So you believe that when a foreigner comes into the country, they simply just exist and take up space? You don't think they, you know, buy things and work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I've read the whole thread, how do you think I got down here?

    They take up space without contributing, that's the difference between an inhabitant, and a citizen.

    This is what you just said. Can you explain how I mischaracterized it? I feel like I just reworded this sentence pretty directly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    If your analogy is based on consumption it makes no sense.

    Meanwhile, I could drop eat from mine response and the point stands with a dry place to sit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Irregular immigrants contribute to the communities they exist in. They help their neighbors, they perform work, they pay taxes via sales tax, gas tax, etc. In fact, by the metrics of tax contribution, they contribute a higher percentage of their income back to their local municipalities than most citizens. Saying they don't contribute is outright racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)