It should go
4:20:59
4:20:60
4:20:61
4:20:62
4:20:63
4:20:64
4:20:65
4:20:66
4:20:67
4:20:68
4:20:69 Nice
4:21:10

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 9 months ago

It can be, although the example I've given where each counter is a discrete part is probably no longer the case. It's likely that larger ICs which encompass all the requisite functionality can do the job, at lower cost than individual parts.

But those ICs probably can't do 4:20:69, so I didn't bother mentioning that.

  • source
  • parent