A number of pro-gun rights Republicans pushed back on the administration's argument that Alex Pretti was dangerous because he had a gun. Pretti was legally licensed to carry one.

A war of words over deeply held beliefs erupted on the political right in the hours after a federal agent shot and killed Alex Pretti on a Minneapolis street Saturday, pitting top officials in Donald Trump’s administration against Second Amendment defenders in his electoral base.

At the core of the debate is that Pretti — who was permitted to carry a gun in public in Minnesota — had a concealed firearm on his person that eyewitness videos show federal agents apparently discovering and removing during the altercation that led to his death. Videos do not appear to show Pretti holding the weapon during that confrontation.

Kristi Noem sought to justify the killing by asserting at a news conference that Pretti “attacked those officers, had a weapon on him, and multiple dozens of rounds of ammunition, wishing to inflict harm on these officers coming, brandishing like that and impeding their work that they were doing.” No evidence has been provided to back up this account.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 9 months ago (14 children)

I am against firearms in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (13 children)

    Fair enough. The modern world would probably be an overall better place if firearms didn't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    But they do exist. And you don't want the fascist to be the only ones who have them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Well the fascists AND non-fascists have them in America. Not seeing how its making any difference.

    2A was specifically written to help prevent a tyrannical government.

    Hasn't worked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    It was never claimed that it would work overnight. You can't just plead the 2nd as if it were the 5th and , flash, everything is all democracy again. Organized and individual actions, both, will likely be necessary.

    All the Second does for us is ensure that we weren't disarmed at this point. One thing I can guarantee is that nobody is going to be discussing any plans for retaliation on this forum or any like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Every day we get closer to the tipping point. Arm yourself with a firearm and the knowledge on how to use it safely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The anti-fascist having a gun doesn't seem to have helped him in any way. Just giving the fascists a talking point for demonizing him after the fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago*

    They'll make up any excuse. This one is bullshit like the rest but this excuse is one that has been the law since 1791. People seem to really care about it and previous SCOTUSs have made very clear that no laws can infringe on that even when it's to prevent harm.

    I feel so funny on this because I want to defend a right under attack by the rump admin but also it's a right I want limited in many ways... Just not right now.

  • source
  • parent