59
The lost art of XML — mmagueta (marcosmagueta.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There exists a peculiar amnesia in software engineering regarding XML. Mention it in most circles and you will receive knowing smiles, dismissive waves, the sort of patronizing acknowledgment reserved for technologies deemed passé. "Oh, XML," they say, as if the very syllables carry the weight of obsolescence. "We use JSON now. Much cleaner."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 6 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/

[children] An ordered list of child information items, in document order.

Does this not cover it?

Do you mean if you were to follow XML standard but not XML information set standard?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    If the XML parser parses into an ordered representation (the XML information set), isn't it then the deserializer's choice how they map that to the programming language/type system they are deserializing to? So in a system with ordered arrays it would likely map to those?

    If XML can be written in an ordered way, and the parsed XML information set has ordered children for those, I still don't see where order gets lost or is impossible [to guarantee] in XML.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    load more comments (1 reply)