you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Oh good. If you resort to hyperbole to prove your argument you’ve already lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (6 children)

    Okay, since its obviously hyperbole that it isnt possible, its a potential outcome so lets return to my original question (deemed a massive assumption on my part by you):

    once it no longer needs massive amounts of expensive resources, what then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    So copypasting your question does what…? If you can’t be bothered to think through my answer and think of a different question, then go re-read the answer I already gave you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (4 children)

    Okay, its called a hypothetical, which you ignored. I therefore ignored your bad faith attempt at diverting the discussion at hand. Hypothetically, what happens when it is energy efficient? Its not impossible. I am only saying, sure do whatever you gotta do to regulate ai now, but it will eventually get there, and then what?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Then, hyperbolically, and hypothetically, the entire electronic and computing world is massively changed and not just AI. Because such a change wouldn’t be limited to AI’s use. I wish you wouldn’t keep playing with the conditions of the argument myopically in an attempt to be right. If you don’t like someone criticizing hyperbole and hypotheticals, don’t use them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments