▲ 806 ▼ AI boom could falter without wider adoption, Microsoft chief Satya Nadella warns (www.irishtimes.com) submitted 9 months ago by Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 234 comments fedilink hide all child comments Big tech boss tells delegates at Davos that broader global use is essential if technology is to deliver lasting growth
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago (5 children) Unless someone bails them out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 9 months ago (4 children) Who's going to do that? Everyone with any money is already leveraged up to the eyeballs in this shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago oh honey, it's going to be tax dollars permalink fedilink source parent [–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 9 months ago (2 children) So you're saying they're too big to fail? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh, we'll see about that. The key difference between tech giants and the banks, is the tech giants aren't holding everyone's money hostage. Sure, those gen Z kids will lose all their photos of grandma because they couldn't fathom a world without Instagram, but we'll cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago No, but when the AI bubble bursts it will wipe out between roughly 40% and 60% of the value of the US’s stock market, depending on which estimate you go by. For comparison, the initial crash of 1929 saw the stock market losing around a third of its value. So either the government does bail them out, or it’ll be worse than that crash was. Neither option is good for the little people permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 9 months ago (4 children) Who's going to do that? Everyone with any money is already leveraged up to the eyeballs in this shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago oh honey, it's going to be tax dollars permalink fedilink source parent [–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 9 months ago (2 children) So you're saying they're too big to fail? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh, we'll see about that. The key difference between tech giants and the banks, is the tech giants aren't holding everyone's money hostage. Sure, those gen Z kids will lose all their photos of grandma because they couldn't fathom a world without Instagram, but we'll cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago No, but when the AI bubble bursts it will wipe out between roughly 40% and 60% of the value of the US’s stock market, depending on which estimate you go by. For comparison, the initial crash of 1929 saw the stock market losing around a third of its value. So either the government does bail them out, or it’ll be worse than that crash was. Neither option is good for the little people permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago oh honey, it's going to be tax dollars permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 9 months ago (2 children) So you're saying they're too big to fail? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh, we'll see about that. The key difference between tech giants and the banks, is the tech giants aren't holding everyone's money hostage. Sure, those gen Z kids will lose all their photos of grandma because they couldn't fathom a world without Instagram, but we'll cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago No, but when the AI bubble bursts it will wipe out between roughly 40% and 60% of the value of the US’s stock market, depending on which estimate you go by. For comparison, the initial crash of 1929 saw the stock market losing around a third of its value. So either the government does bail them out, or it’ll be worse than that crash was. Neither option is good for the little people permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh, we'll see about that. The key difference between tech giants and the banks, is the tech giants aren't holding everyone's money hostage. Sure, those gen Z kids will lose all their photos of grandma because they couldn't fathom a world without Instagram, but we'll cope. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago No, but when the AI bubble bursts it will wipe out between roughly 40% and 60% of the value of the US’s stock market, depending on which estimate you go by. For comparison, the initial crash of 1929 saw the stock market losing around a third of its value. So either the government does bail them out, or it’ll be worse than that crash was. Neither option is good for the little people permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago No, but when the AI bubble bursts it will wipe out between roughly 40% and 60% of the value of the US’s stock market, depending on which estimate you go by. For comparison, the initial crash of 1929 saw the stock market losing around a third of its value. So either the government does bail them out, or it’ll be worse than that crash was. Neither option is good for the little people permalink fedilink source parent