▲ 21 ▼ YouTube SRV3 subtitles reportedly being disabled, users report custom captions no longer working (piunikaweb.com) submitted 9 months ago by SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org to c/hololive@lemmy.world 6 comments fedilink hide all child comments YouTube appears to be cracking down on SRV3 subtitle files, disabling new uploads and deleting existing custom captions from major channels including Hololive, Dream.
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (5 children) Kronii_but_why.mp4 This is just intentionally making their platform worse, wow. permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org [S] 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) One of the many ways, yes. It's a shame it's probably not economically feasible or convenient for Cover to have their own streaming platform (peertube? 🤔) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Personally I think it would be economically feasible for them, probably not convenient to switch because they would lose a lot of visibility, but having a mirror site (and, especially, a mirror place to superchat dodging Youtube's cut) would be a genius move with their current market share, imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org [S] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) It depends where the majority of revenue for them comes from, superchats or YTads, honestly I don't know. If it's ads, it wouldn't be a good idea to abandon YouTube (then again, I wouldn't mind ads on 'CoverTube' if they weren't too many) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* I heavily doubt it's ads, channels whose majority of the audience mainly watches livestreams usually get very little from them. And they make a TON of money from superchats (and membership!) compared to the average streamer, so I'd assume the divide is even bigger. The main reason why abandoning Youtube as a whole might be detrimental is for the visibility. You get a lot less new users if you spin a new platform, it's a move you can afford to make only if you know your current audience is enough to be self-sustainable. permalink fedilink source parent [–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago My guess is they want to replace all the subtitles with their own shitty AI generated subtitles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org [S] 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) One of the many ways, yes. It's a shame it's probably not economically feasible or convenient for Cover to have their own streaming platform (peertube? 🤔) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Personally I think it would be economically feasible for them, probably not convenient to switch because they would lose a lot of visibility, but having a mirror site (and, especially, a mirror place to superchat dodging Youtube's cut) would be a genius move with their current market share, imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org [S] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) It depends where the majority of revenue for them comes from, superchats or YTads, honestly I don't know. If it's ads, it wouldn't be a good idea to abandon YouTube (then again, I wouldn't mind ads on 'CoverTube' if they weren't too many) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* I heavily doubt it's ads, channels whose majority of the audience mainly watches livestreams usually get very little from them. And they make a TON of money from superchats (and membership!) compared to the average streamer, so I'd assume the divide is even bigger. The main reason why abandoning Youtube as a whole might be detrimental is for the visibility. You get a lot less new users if you spin a new platform, it's a move you can afford to make only if you know your current audience is enough to be self-sustainable. permalink fedilink source parent [–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago My guess is they want to replace all the subtitles with their own shitty AI generated subtitles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Personally I think it would be economically feasible for them, probably not convenient to switch because they would lose a lot of visibility, but having a mirror site (and, especially, a mirror place to superchat dodging Youtube's cut) would be a genius move with their current market share, imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org [S] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) It depends where the majority of revenue for them comes from, superchats or YTads, honestly I don't know. If it's ads, it wouldn't be a good idea to abandon YouTube (then again, I wouldn't mind ads on 'CoverTube' if they weren't too many) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* I heavily doubt it's ads, channels whose majority of the audience mainly watches livestreams usually get very little from them. And they make a TON of money from superchats (and membership!) compared to the average streamer, so I'd assume the divide is even bigger. The main reason why abandoning Youtube as a whole might be detrimental is for the visibility. You get a lot less new users if you spin a new platform, it's a move you can afford to make only if you know your current audience is enough to be self-sustainable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org [S] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) It depends where the majority of revenue for them comes from, superchats or YTads, honestly I don't know. If it's ads, it wouldn't be a good idea to abandon YouTube (then again, I wouldn't mind ads on 'CoverTube' if they weren't too many) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* I heavily doubt it's ads, channels whose majority of the audience mainly watches livestreams usually get very little from them. And they make a TON of money from superchats (and membership!) compared to the average streamer, so I'd assume the divide is even bigger. The main reason why abandoning Youtube as a whole might be detrimental is for the visibility. You get a lot less new users if you spin a new platform, it's a move you can afford to make only if you know your current audience is enough to be self-sustainable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* I heavily doubt it's ads, channels whose majority of the audience mainly watches livestreams usually get very little from them. And they make a TON of money from superchats (and membership!) compared to the average streamer, so I'd assume the divide is even bigger. The main reason why abandoning Youtube as a whole might be detrimental is for the visibility. You get a lot less new users if you spin a new platform, it's a move you can afford to make only if you know your current audience is enough to be self-sustainable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago My guess is they want to replace all the subtitles with their own shitty AI generated subtitles. permalink fedilink source parent