Carbon capture and storage (CCS) may sound simple and promising enough. It involves the capture of carbon dioxide (CO2) at its source—such as an industrial plant—before it can enter the atmosphere, storing it deep underground in geological formations such as oil wells.

“The bottom line is that carbon capture just increases CO2,” says Mark Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, California. “It increases air pollution. It increases fossil fuel mining, fossil fuel infrastructure, pipelines, and it results in more oil being drilled. In the end, all it does is keep the fossil fuel industry in business . . . so it’s basically a scam.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

God they overthink it (or, yes, scam). It's not hard, grow tree, bury tree, grow another tree (or similar with phytoplankton or seaweed or whatever), rinse, repeat. Not a permanent solution but it'll give us some breathing room (ha ha, sigh) to find a better one, but that's not tied to profit, just survival.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I have a stupid question: when you bury the tree, I presume that will be done using machinery and...uh...burn fuel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Sure, but as long as it's (much) less than the amount of carbon in the tree we're good. Smart choice of geography would make it better, rehabilitating mines and so forth, also good for enriching farmland (eventually).

  • source
  • parent