you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I think this is more so implying if-then statements rather than a literal mathematical representation:

If there is more cheese, then there is more holes. If there is more holes, then there is less cheese. Therefore, if there is more cheese, then there is less cheese.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    The assumption that cheese has holes is not true. Many times I come home with cheese with no holes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Yup! The first premise is wrong, since there is plenty of cheese without holes—meaning that more cheese does not imply or equal to more holes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Can’t imagine the weight of air inside the holes is significant compared to the weight of cheese; taking a glance at the numbers, cheese is 800-900x more dense than air. Given cheese is sold by weight, more holes = very slightly less cheese, practically negligible.

    Now I’m curious about how much space a block of 99% holes cheese would occupy. Maybe something like aerocheese, with a whole bunch of microscopic air bubbles throughout.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Also wrong. There's an implied "than <other object>". For the first one it's "than a smaller piece of cheese with the same ratio of holes" and the second is "than a piece of cheese of the same size".

  • source
  • parent