you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

LOL care to educate us on why a statistical model is unacceptable while a procedural model (also statistical 🙃) is acceptable, then? 🤔 I'll wait.

(reality: it's a minor implementation detail and has no relevance to the user)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    There's a number of reasons, not least of which being that generative AI works by processing vast amounts of prior work (without their creators' consent) to make a facsimile of it, while procedural generation only manipulates assets the developer creates. Procedural generation isn't putting artists and writers out of business. Procedural generation isn't making Idiocracy a reality, with fucking English majors unable to read Dickens without asking OpenAI to interpret the text for them. "They do similar things" doesn't mean they're equivalent. My point being, it's not inconsistent to be okay with procedural generation and not okay with generative AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It's literally just implementation and they're both statistical models, but 👍

    If you disagree, explain how. I'll wait

    no wonder you hail AI as good

    When, exactly, did I? I called them both janky dogshit, but simply pointed out the very real hypocrisy of supporting procedural generation while hating generative AI.

  • source
  • parent